CfPA Regulatory & Legislative Policy Platform

CfPA Board of Directors 2025 Policy Platform

Full formatted document is here: https://cfpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CfPA-Policy-Platform-Jan-2025.pdf

 

CfPA Policy Positions

As Approved by the CfPA Board of Directors

Adopted May 10, 2024, amended September 13, 2024 and January 10, 2025

CfPA Policy Positions

As Approved by the CfPA Board of Directors

Adopted May 10, 2024, amended September 13, 2024, January 10, 2025, and March 14, 2025

 

1. Exemptive Relief for Small Offerings

Reg CF should be an accessible and useful tool for diverse businesses from small

mom-and-pop shops to high-growth tech companies. The current rules make it

financially infeasible to conduct small raises because the fixed costs are high and

experts are needed to ensure compliance. Therefore, we support the consideration of

relief from some of the more onerous requirements for small offerings.

 

2. Reform of Requirements for Financial Reporting

The requirement to provide an independent review or audit is nonsensical for a

business with no operating history – we support tailoring the financial reporting

requirements so that reviews and audits are only required for businesses with at least

six months of operating history. Similarly, the requirement of GAAP financials should be

waived for early-stage and smaller businesses (including crowdfunding vehicles they

use for their raises). This applies to post-raise reporting as well. For those issuers that

choose to provide a higher level of reporting, this can be prominently disclosed so that

potential investors know that they are receiving a more fully vetted financial report. Note

that the Small Business Administration does not require GAAP-compliant financials for

its borrowers.

 

3. Consistency and Transparency in Oversight of Portals

Consistent regulatory compliance is necessary to ensure the viability of the industry. All

portals should be subject to the same level of scrutiny and enforcement. Rule violations

should be addressed quickly to maintain the public’s confidence in the tool. To prevent

the appearance of arbitrary inconsistency, regulatory decisions and guidance provided

by both FINRA and the SEC should be made available to the public.

 

Portals report that FINRA is not transparent about the requirements it imposes for new

applications or for audits, creating a great deal of uncertainty and a long drawn-out

approval process. FINRA often imposes multiple extensions on the approval process as

seemingly arbitrary requirements are imposed.

 

We request that FINRA be required to (1) publish guidance regarding its requirements

for new portals, (2) update the FP-NMA to reflect what is actually required to be

considered complete, (3) provide guidance for ongoing compliance of existing portals,

and (4) treat each portal consistently in regards to those requirements.

 

4. Simplification of Rules

We support streamlining overly complicated requirements such as the per investor

annual investment limit and the advertising rules, which are extremely confusing and

almost impossible to comply with. We support a simplification of these rules such as

allowing issuers to include terms in all public communications (irrespective of when

those communications are made in the offering process) and having per investor limits

mirror the simpler requirement under Reg A.

 

5. Disclosures to Investors

It is important that investors understand what they are getting when they invest and the

potential tax implications of those investments. The SEC should provide portals with

standard disclosures regarding the following:

i. details of what an investor is receiving in exchange for their investment

ii. whether the investor is investing directly in the issuer or a crowdfunding

vehicle

iii. a warning about potential tax issues in the form of a general overview

and the recommendation to consult one’s tax advisor

iv. if the investor is investing in a crowdfunding vehicle, what this means in

terms of fees, costs, tax treatment, governance rights, ongoing

record-keeping requirements, etc.

v. the importance of reviewing the Form C and a prominent link to view the

Form C with all Form C pdfs clearly labeled.

 

6. Searchable PDFs on EDGAR

In the interest of enhancing transparency and efficacy in investor due diligence, we

propose a crucial amendment to the current filing requirements within the SEC EDGAR

system. Specifically, we recommend the mandatory submission of searchable PDF

documents, rather than the current practice of uploading flattened, non-searchable files.

The inability to conduct keyword searches within lengthy offering circulars and other

crucial documents not only undermines the efficiency of the investment decision

process but also potentially obscures critical information necessary for a thorough

evaluation. Key terms or other indicators of investment risk and opportunity must be

readily accessible to investors. This enhancement in document accessibility will

significantly improve investors’ ability to conduct comprehensive and efficient analyses,

ensuring they are better informed and more equipped to make judicious investment

decisions.

 

7. Disclosures to Issuers

Issuers must receive clear and complete disclosures regarding portal fees, privacy

policies, and the use of crowdfunding vehicles. Portals should be required to provide

complete, prominent, plain English disclosures regarding all of the following issues:

i. if the portal requires the use of a crowdfunding vehicle and the

implications of the use of a crowdfunding vehicle

ii. all fees charged by the portal, including fees charged by third-party

service providers required by the portal

iii. a reminder that the issuer is responsible for the content of the Form C and

the implications of allowing the portal to file on its behalf, including the

risks of filing an incomplete or noncompliant document with the SEC

iv. the issuer’s annual reporting requirements, including the requirement to

maintain GAAP-compliant financials and additional reporting requirements

when a crowdfunding vehicle is used.

 

8. Crowdfunding Vehicles and Avoiding Registration

The CfPA supports the following changes:

a. The rules governing crowdfunding vehicles are challenging to apply in practice –

the concept of a “one-to-one relationship” is not easily interpreted in many

contexts. There is a need for greater clarity and examples of how the SPV should

be structured when the crowdfunding issuer securities are SAFEs, convertible

notes, etc. (as opposed to shares or LLC equity interests).

b. The use of a crowdfunding vehicle can add a great deal of expense and

complexity to an offering because the crowdfunding vehicle itself is subject to all

of the same compliance requirements as the underlying issuer. To reduce the

need to use crowdfunding vehicles, we support removing the $25 million asset

cap for companies wishing to avoid registration under Section 12(g).

c. There is a lack of consistency regarding the use of Series LLCs as crowdfunding

vehicles – while one portal uses a Series LLC, other portals have been told by

FINRA that Series LLCs may not be used. FINRA should provide unequivocal

guidance on this issue.

d. We also request clarification regarding what it means to be “current in ongoing

annual reports” with respect to the requirements for avoiding registration under

Section 12(g). We request confirmation that as long as the issuer has filed all

required reports, it will be considered “current in ongoing annual reports.”

 

9. Crowdfunding by Portals

We support allowing portals to raise funding on their own platforms as long as the

relationship is fully disclosed and the number of raises is limited (e.g. one per year).

Requiring portals to raise on competitor’s platforms creates an unfair limitation on

portals’ ability to raise under Reg CF.

 

10. Allowing Investment Funds to Raise under Reg CF

The current statute provides that Title III does not apply to any issuer that “is an

investment company, as defined in section 80a–3 of this title, or is excluded from the

definition of investment company by section 80a–3(b) of this title or section 80a–3(c) of

this title.”

 

We propose striking this provision so that investment companies and companies

excluded from the definition of an investment company under Sections 3(b) and (c) of

the Investment Company Act may raise funds under Regulation Crowdfunding.

We also propose the addition of a new exemption under Section 3(c) of the Investment

Company Act for small funds (e.g. up to $50 million) with no limitations on number of

investors or method of solicitation.

 

11. Tax and Accounting Treatment of Securities

Many of the securities offered by small businesses face ambiguity regarding their tax

treatment. We request assistance with securing guidance from the IRS and FASB on

instruments like revenue-based debt and SAFEs.

 

12. Unsecured RBF Debt

We request that the SBA treat unsecured revenue-based debt instruments as equity

when determining eligibility for a loan.

 

13. Tax Credit for Crowd Investors

We support the implementation of an annual tax credit of up to $1,000 for any individual

(up to $2,000 for married couples filing jointly) with income not exceeding $539,000 (or

$647,850 for married couples filing jointly), or whatever corresponding income levels

may be in effect and applicable to the top tax bracket, and that has made an investment

into one or more issuers raising money through a Reg CF offering, such that the total

amount invested into issuers for the preceding year totals two times the amount of the

tax credit.

 

14. Annual Report Submission

We request that the SEC provide a more user- friendly tool (outside of EDGAR which is

extremely confusing for inexperienced users) for submitting annual reports so that

issuers may avoid vendor fees for filing their reports.

 

15. When a Reg CF Issuer Goes Public

Investors that have invested in an issuer via Reg CF have difficulty getting their

securities into a brokerage account when the issuer conducts an IPO. This sometimes

results in the Reg CF investors being unable to sell when the shares are at their highest

price. We request industry guidance to prevent this unfair treatment of Reg CF

investors.

 

16. Annual Raise Limits

a. We support an increase on the cap for issuers raising funds for the Reg CF

annual limit from $5M to $20M and the Reg A (Tier 2) annual limit from $75M to

$150M.

b. We support an amendment to Title III of the JOBS Act that removes limits on the

SEC’s authority to increase the caps on the amounts that can be raised under

Regulation Crowdfunding.

 

17. Privacy and Safeguarding of Nonpublic Personal Information

Crowdfunding intermediaries should be required to provide notices to customers about

their privacy policies and practices, describe conditions under which they may disclose

nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties, and provide customers with

an opportunity to opt out of such disclosures. Intermediaries should also implement an

information security program that includes administrative, technical, and physical

safeguards designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of nonpublic

personal information.

 

18. Consistency of Terminology

The term “equity crowdfunding” is used frequently by industry participants. This term is

misleading because it implies that what investors are getting is an equity investment

which is often not the case. We support the requirement to use the term “Regulated

Investment Crowdfunding” consistently to prevent confusion and request the SEC

formalize this requirement, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the investment landscape.

 

Crowdfunding Professional Association – www.CfPA.org

contact@CfPA.org 712 H Street NE Suite 2127, Washington, DC 20002